I got energized about the environment, climate, and energy as a physics undergrad during the first energy crisis. Since then, I’ve worked in activist groups (Anti-nuclear, the wrong side: Now I fight climate change as penance for the sins of my youth), held policy positions in the governments of the United States and Canada, worked in two international organizations, and taught energy, climate, and environmental policy at Harvard, Michigan, and now UCLA. There’s so much written on climate change that it’s a rare pleasure to find something that cuts through the noise and says something original or important. So I’m delighted to recommend these, which include a couple of overlooked gems.
I wrote...
The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A Guide to the Debate
I wrote this book with my colleague Andy Dessler because we were frustrated by the confused arguments around climate change and wanted to help people understand what was real and what was not, and what controversies were serious.
We give accounts of how the climate works and how it’s changing, what this means for impacts on people and things they care about, and what can be done about it – both by new technologies, and by laws and policies – the levers that actually make things happen in the world. For both science and law and policy, we dig beyond top-line lists of facts to give people the concepts and tools they need to think critically about reasoning and evidence.
This book makes the stakes of climate change real.
Lynas paints vivid, reasonably science-based pictures of what the world would look like at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 degrees C hotter (we’re at 1.4 today). The biggest reason I like this book is how forcefully it exposes the lazy thinking of the “over the cliff, all is lost, curl up and die” variety. In fact, hotter is worse, hotter by more is worse by more, and it keeps going.
So even if our efforts are working to keep it below 2.5, below 3, below 3.5, or worse (versus the Paris targets of 1.5 or 2.0), these aims are of extreme importance and profoundly worth fighting for. The book’s moral message: Yes, it’s scary; much will be lost, but much of the value remains, so don’t give up.
This book must not be ignored. It really is our final warning.
Mark Lynas delivers a vital account of the future of our earth, and our civilisation, if current rates of global warming persist. And it's only looking worse.
We are living in a climate emergency. But how much worse could it get? Will civilisation collapse? Are we already past the point of no return? What kind of future can our children expect? Rigorously cataloguing the very latest climate science, Mark Lynas explores the course we have set for Earth over the next century and beyond. Degree by terrifying degree,…
This is a miraculous book, an astonishing tour de force of clarity, insight, optimism, and fun. Yes, I’m calling an energy book fun. Transforming world energy–moving from fossil fuels to renewables and other climate-safe sources – is the biggest part of limiting climate change, but the field is littered with vague, confusing, and grandiose claims.
MacKay cuts through the nonsense and makes the numbers and charts sing, so they stick in your brain like a catchy melody. I don’t care that it was written mostly for the UK and in 2009. Nothing since is half as good, and the concepts and tools haven’t changed. You just need to remind yourself that solar, wind, and EVs have made huge gains since then, so the picture is somewhat more optimistic than MacKay paints.
Read this book. I mean it. You will feel empowered, and you will feel smarter.
Addressing the sustainable energy crisis in an objective manner, this enlightening book analyzes the relevant numbers and organizes a plan for change on both a personal level and an international scale--for Europe, the United States, and the world. In case study format, this informative reference answers questions surrounding nuclear energy, the potential of sustainable fossil fuels, and the possibilities of sharing renewable power with foreign countries.
While underlining the difficulty of minimizing consumption, the tone remains positive as it debunks misinformation and clearly explains the calculations of expenditure per person to encourage people to make individual changes that will benefit…
I find reading this book like sitting with a wise friend who gently tells you you’re making a big mistake, but you can still fix it, and it can be OK.
Recent climate policy has gone off the rails with the idea of “net zero,” a sleight-of-hand that makes it look much easier: We don’t actually have to stop emitting; we can just offset emissions by removing them from the atmosphere later to pay back the debt. Yeah, right. This is true in theory but deeply problematic in practice: risky, and prone to error and deception. Some emissions can continue to be offset by removals to get to global net zero or net negative. But the current net-zero bandwagon, with everyone pretending their emissions can continue, is dangerous madness.
Buck brings her clear insight and ruthless honesty to this deeply confused area. She gently holds the popular delusions up for scrutiny, clarifies what actually has to happen, and points out that this is possible and we need to get on with it.
Around the world, countries and companies are setting net-zero carbon emissions targets. But "net-zero" is a term that conveniently obscures multiple futures. There could be a version of net-zero where the fossil fuel industry is still spewing tens of billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, and has built a corresponding industry in sucking it back out again. Holly Buck argues that focusing on emissions draws our attention away from where we need to be looking: the point of production.
It is time to plan for the end of fossil fuel and the companies that profit from them. Fossil…
You’re probably wondering, if we can’t do what Buck and MacKay point us to in time to avoid the world that Lynas paints, what then?
I have good news: we’re still not (quite) out of options. It looks possible to cool the Earth a degree or two within a few years by spraying a mist of reflective aerosols – sort of like your plant sprayer – in the upper atmosphere to scatter a percent or so of incoming sunlight. This approach, solar geoengineering, is a band-aid, not a cure for climate change. It doesn’t avoid the need to slash emissions, and it brings a bunch of new uncertainties and potential problems. But it can buy time and might be the only way to avoid Lynas’s world quickly.
Morton digs into these technologies, what we know and don’t know about them, and the controversies, with erudition and wit. I love his writing because he’s interested in everything and weaves it all together brilliantly, with historical detail, personal quirks, and clear, accessible explanations of scientific issues. As with MacKay and Buck, you come away with cautious optimism: people can manage big challenges, and things can turn out OK.
The risks of global warming are pressing and potentially vast. The difficulty of doing without fossil fuels is daunting, possibly even insurmountable. So there is an urgent need to rethink our responses to the crisis. To meet that need, a small but increasingly influential group of scientists is exploring proposals for planned human intervention in the climate system: a stratospheric veil against the sun, the cultivation of photosynthetic plankton, fleets of unmanned ships seeding the clouds. These are the technologies of geoengineering--and as Oliver Morton argues in this visionary book, it would be as irresponsible to ignore them as it…
I’ve long been a fan of Robinson’s fiction. This recent book tells the story of how humanity navigates the climate crisis, starting a few years from now and going maybe 30 years into the future, centered on the people leading the new (fictitious) UN organization of the title.
Robinson pulls all the strands together plausibly – increasingly severe impacts, everyone thrashing around trying responses, and conflict. He doesn’t shy away from violence, errors, tragic choices, or the vast scale of disruption and suffering climate change holds in store. Yet I find it a strangely optimistic book. The worst doesn’t happen. People and nations eventually pull together, more or less. Sustained intense efforts stop further climate change (collapsing what will take 100+ years into 25 to keep the plot moving) and preserve a livable world with some movement toward justice and sustainability.
I find it a more or less credible illustration of a path toward the survival of decent societies that doesn’t rely on magic solutions and doesn’t ignore greed and folly. As with my other recommendations, I love that Robinson treats his readers like intelligent adults.
“The best science-fiction nonfiction novel I’ve ever read.” —Jonathan Lethem
"If I could get policymakers, and citizens, everywhere to read just one book this year, it would be Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the Future." —Ezra Klein (Vox)
The Ministry for the Future is a masterpiece of the imagination, using fictional eyewitness accounts to tell the story of how climate change will affect us all. Its setting is not a desolate, postapocalyptic world, but a future that is almost upon us. Chosen by Barack Obama as one of his favorite…
I became fascinated with 16th-century and 17th-century Europe after reading Don Quixote many years ago. Since then, every novel or nonfiction book about that era has felt both ancient and contemporary. I’m always struck by how much our environment has changed—transportation, communication, housing, government—but also how little we as people have changed when it comes to ambition, love, grief, and greed. I doubled down my reading on that time period when I researched my novel, Dulcinea. Many people read in the eras of the Renaissance, World War II, or ancient Greece, so I’m hoping to introduce them to the Baroque Age.
Dolça Llull Prat, a wealthy Barcelona woman, is only 15 when she falls in love with an impoverished poet-solder. Theirs is a forbidden relationship, one that overcomes many obstacles until the fledgling writer renders her as the lowly Dulcinea in his bestseller.
By doing so, he unwittingly exposes his muse to gossip. But when Dolça receives his deathbed note asking to see her, she races across Spain with the intention of unburdening herself of an old secret.
On the journey, she encounters bandits, the Inquisition, illness, and the choices she's made. At its heart, Dulcinea is about how we betray the people we love, what happens when we succumb to convention, and why we squander the few chances we get to change our lives.
